Prospect watch: South Allegheny lineman gaining interest
6-FOOT-1, 280 POUNDS, NT, SOUTH ALLEGHENY
His face covered in blood after smashing his head off the dashboard, Ryan Bednar was strapped to a stretcher and carted away while a visiting Syracuse assistant coach watched.
Not to worry, college recruiters. The scene was part of a mock car-crash during a South Allegheny assembly to warn students against the dangers of driving under the influence.
“It was fun to see a college coach watching what I do to help my school,” said Bednar, an honors student who also serves as the junior class president.
Bednar also helps the Gladiators on the football field, and the two-way lineman is attracting Division I interest on defense. Going head-to-head against Jesse James, a 6-foot-7, 255-pound Penn State recruit, every day in practice last fall helped his cause.
“I've been working so hard on my explosiveness through my hips and body,” said Bednar, who bench-presses 400 pounds and has great lower-body power. “My strength is good and it's only improving day by day. My speed coming off the ball and reaction time to the ball being snapped is very quick.”
Bednar is hoping to draw a reaction from college coaches this summer by attending camps at Bowling Green, Ohio, Pitt, Syracuse and Youngstown State. Bucknell, Duquesne and Robert Morris, which offered a scholarship last week, also are interested.
“Ryan is a non-stop worker who is really difficult to block with one person,” South Allegheny coach Pat Monroe said. “He's a technician, a real student of the game.”
One who is getting a crash-course in recruiting.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.