Decision time nears for Montour two-sport star
TribLIVE Sports Videos
6-foot-3, 180 pounds, WR-CB, Montour
Devin Wilson has made one important decision about the future of his athletic career: The Montour football and basketball star won't play both sports in college.
“Akron says they would consider it, but I really don't want to play two sports,” said Wilson, who along with scholarship offers in both sports from the Zips has football offers from North Carolina State, Ohio and Temple, and Duquesne and James Madison in basketball.
“I just want to play one in college so I can really focus on my talent at one. I haven't really been able to do that. I want to show I can excel at one sport instead of training for both.”
Now he just has to choose which one.
Where his Spartans teammates Matt Barone and Tyler Haddock have changed their commitments to Temple — Barone from Connecticut, Haddock from Kent State — Wilson is having a hard time picking football over basketball. Or vice versa.
Wilson was the leading receiver in the WPIAL last fall for the Class AAA champions and the catalyst as point guard on Montour's PIAA Class AAA finalist.
“I just want to go to the best sport, which benefits me for the future, and the school which helps me be my best,” Wilson said. “It's hard to choose a sport. My mind changes all the time. That's why it's so hard to choose one.”
Wilson has sought advice from his brother, Christian, who played football at North Carolina, and Montour assistant coach Daren Tielsch, who played hoops at Penn State, Robert Morris and Edinboro. Wilson hopes to pick a sport by the end of the month. Then he can start to focus on choosing a college.
“I do believe that I'm blessed to have the opportunities to not only pick which sport I want to play but to pick a college,” Wilson said. “But it is really hard to choose one sport, then choose one school over the other schools.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.