Lista-Brinza hopes to fall in line of successful Central Catholic tailbacks
Luigi Lista-Brinza waited his turn to become the latest in a long line of talented tailbacks at Central Catholic.
Now, Lista-Brinza hopes to match the productivity of predecessors Eugene Jarvis, Lamont Smith and Damion Jones-Moore.
“I've been working real hard, trying to be that next back and keep the tradition going,” he said. “I'm real excited to start again.”
Central coach Terry Totten warned that there will be a distinct difference in the Vikings' backfield, because the 5-foot-9, 175-pound junior is a “drop-your-shoulder, downhill runner who doesn't fit their jitterbug mold.”
“He's a little different,” Central offensive coordinator Dave Fleming said. “He fights for every single yard, making guys miss. He's not a breakaway back, but he gets the tough ones for you.”
Lista-Brinza ran for 779 yards and eight touchdowns in 2010, while filling in for an injured Jones-Moore.
Those numbers dipped dramatically last fall, when Lista-Brinza ran for 363 yards and four scores while backing up Jones-Moore, a Toledo recruit who rushed for 1,673 yards and 27 touchdowns.
Lista-Brinza played multiple positions and starred on special teams, returning the opening kickoff 92 yards for a touchdown against Peters Township. The Vikings believe it made him more diverse — and dangerous.
“It helped him to watch and learn the offense,” Fleming said.
“His freshman year, he played on feel. This year, I'm expecting him to play with feel and knowledge. I can line him up anywhere.”
Lista-Brinza should benefit from running behind senior fullback Leo Loughrey, a battering ram who stars at outside linebacker, and an offensive line led by 6-2, 250-pound junior tackle Steve Wood.
“He has all the intangibles: hard work, toughness, dedication, leadership,” Totten said. “He's someone we'll count on.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.