Franco's 2nd stint at Altoona begins with rebuilding plan
TribLIVE Sports Videos
He's not exactly a newbie, but it's been awhile since John Franco walked the sideline for the Altoona Mountain Lions.
Franco left Altoona in 1993 after compiling a 40-45-2 record in eight seasons, including a District 6-AAAA championship.
This fall, he will return after guiding Tyrone to a record of 190-37 over 18 seasons. Franco replaces Tom Palfey, who led the Mountain Lions to a 3-6 mark last year. Franco hopes to increase the popularity of football in Altoona, which is going to require some success on the field, he said.
“We're trying to attract kids to the program, but to do that, you have to be successful,” Franco said. “To be successful, you need some of the kids that aren't coming out.”
Competing programs will field between 50 and 70 players this fall, which is around where the Mountain Lions will fall, but Franco is looking for quality over quantity.
“I'm not looking for numbers,” Franco said. “I'm looking for quality, and those are the ones we can't get out. Every (position) is pretty much wide open. Nobody has really established themselves.”
With the graduation of quarterbacks Louis Bettwy and Tyler Palfey, Franco is looking for a leader to step up under center.
“That's wide open at this point,” Franco said before camp. “No one has been that impressive to tell you the truth. We have to find a quarterback and find somebody that can run the system.”
Senior leaders for Altoona this year will include wide receiver/defensive back Jake Diviney, lineman Austin Rosenberry and tight end/defensive end Josh Kutz.
“Those seniors are going to get a chance to play, “ Franco said. “In high school you have to respect every age group and give those kids a chance to play. We'll do that.”
Franco is well aware of the challenge that stands in front of his team.
“We have a lot of work to do. There's no doubt about it.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.