Despite conference change, WPIAL feeling like home for Hollidaysburg
As Hollidaysburg enters its third WPIAL season, coach John Barton thinks the Golden Tigers are becoming more comfortable with their surroundings.
Even if they're not right around the corner.
“We've been traveling for a long time now,” Barton said. “Heading west, like we do, isn't much different than when we were playing down east.”
After years of bouncing around, Hollidaysburg, located just south of Altoona, seems to have found a suitable football home in the WPIAL. The Golden Tigers recently had been members of the District 6-based Mountain Athletic Football Conference and the District 3-based Mid-Penn Conference.
They'll see a few changes again this year within the WPIAL, which has realigned its conferences for this season. Hollidaysburg switches to the Greater Allegheny Conference from the Keystone Conference, joining Derry, Franklin Regional and Greensburg Salem in the move.
“We're thankful to play in the WPIAL and be a part of a class league,” Barton said. “The conference change will present challenges, but they present challenges for all the teams that realigned. We look forward to another year and our new section.”
Hollidaysburg will attempt to improve on a 3-5 record, 3-4 in the Keystone Conference, with a more experienced squad this year.
“We had a completely new defense, and it showed,” Barton said. “Our youth showed, and it hurt us. That was one of our problems, one of our issues.
“I think we're going to be better this year.”
Matt Barton — a 6-foot-1, 280-pound senior and the coach's son — and Pat Ollinger are “two seniors who are very important to us on the offensive and defensive lines,” Coach Barton said.
He added that senior quarterback/defensive back Brian Urban “has made a lot of progress from last year to this year. I'm anticipating him having a good year.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.