Sophomore QB set to lead promising South Fayette
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Breaking in a sophomore at quarterback can be a challenge for any team. Helping the player mature mentally and physically could lead to growing pains throughout the season.
But when the quarterback is a Brumbaugh, it makes things a little easier.
Brett Brumbaugh — younger brother of South Fayette alumnus and WPIAL record-setter Christian Brumbaugh and Seton-La Salle starter Luke Brumbaugh — will take over the quarterback spot this fall for the Lions.
Brumbaugh got his start for the team last season after Mike Lerda went down with an injury. Brumbaugh started the final three games, picking up a 2-1 record while throwing for 606 yards and seven touchdowns.
“He has already gone through some of the growing pains,” South Fayette coach Joe Rossi said. “He will make some mistakes, but what he brings to the team with leadership and a big, strong arm is great.”
Brumbaugh will have an instant target in senior Zach Challingsworth. The Pitt recruit did a little of everything for South Fayette in 2011 — from receiving to running the wildcat to punting. But in 2012, Challingsworth won't need to be used in so many capacities.
“He was our go-to-guy last season,” Rossi said. “He has guys around him this season that will be able to step up. Teams won't be able to focus just on him.”
The weapons around Challingsworth will be numerous. Senior receiver Mike Fetchet returns and is a second-year starter.
Junior receivers Conner Beck and Justin Watson both return after getting playing time last season.
Juniors Grant Fetcher and Zach Walker, along with sophomore J.J. Walker, will provide the Lions a solid ground attack.
The defense also will be littered with returning players. Rossi called the secondary “tremendous,” with Beck and Challingsworth returning.
Seniors Dylan Nock and Shane Girman also are back at linebacker.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.