Winless season provided experience for Mohawk underclassmen
By Meredith Qualls
Published: Thursday, Aug. 23, 2012, 6:29 p.m.
Mohawk coach Joe Lamenza is ready to see results.
“Last year, we were a young football team; we knew we were going to be building,” he said.
In 2011, Mohawk's lineup was composed mostly of first-year starters, including four sophomores and one freshman.
Lamenza's primary focus was building a foundation — setting good habits and building commitment to the weight room.
“We started to build that family-like atmosphere,” he said.
The Warriors did not win any games, but Lamenza saw progress.
“Every week we got a little bit better,” he said.
Last season, Mohawk allowed 381 points and scored 61, but Lamenza said the exposure helped his team, regardless of the result.
“We're a year older,” he said. “We've got a year of experience under our belt.”
For Mohawk, Lamenza will rely on running backs Thomas Beatty and Austin Main, as well Vince Menichino at quarterback and offensive linemen Bob Rob, all seniors.
“There's no substitute for those experiences,” Lamenza said. “The players know to pick up where we left off and try to get better.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.