Despite losing coach and transfers, Greensburg Central Catholic reloads
TribLIVE Sports Videos
All of a sudden, Greensburg Central Catholic football is under new leadership.
Will the Centurions ever be the same now that longtime coach Muzzy Colosimo is gone?
Assistants Dan Mahoney and Matt Federico were elevated to co-coaches Aug. 6 following a swift move to replace Colosimo just before the start of training camp.
“We won't change much at all,” said Mahoney, who had been an assistant at GCC since Colosimo became head coach in 1995.
“I've been with Muzzy for a long time and we'll continue to do the things necessary to be successful, the things we've hung our hat on.”
Aspects such as a strong line and stout defense.
Colosimo, 61, who coached the Centurions for 17 years, compiled a 143-46 record following a 10-2 mark in 2011. He was suspended twice by the school during a 10-month period, the details of which were not made public.
Finally, the school moved to make a change, but Colosimo remained on as head of buildings and grounds and joined the coaching staff at nearby Seton Hill University.
GCC's splendid campaign a year ago quietly ended with a 35-0 loss to Aliquippa in the WPIAL Class AA semifinals, just two years after the Centurions played for a PIAA championship in 2009, losing to Lancaster Catholic, 21-14.
The Centurions return a talented roster, led by senior running back/safety Zach Guiser, an Akron recruit who Mahoney considers a team leader who will lead an experienced defensive backfield.
Senior Mark Rodriguez and juniors Nate Stone, Seth Warburton and J.T. Astalos are the returning linebackers. Colosimo said Stone “has the eyes of just about every college in the country.”
Chase Keller, a 6-foot-3, 185-pound junior, is expected to replace the departed Bobby Noble at quarterback.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.