Familiar face returns to revitalize Waynesburg football team
Waynesburg Central Hunter Cenname photographed at camp on August 14, 2012 in Unity Township.
When Russ Moore coached the Waynesburg football team in the 1990s, the town and its fans were a buzz.
Waynesburg was a consistent WPIAL playoff participant, and the team won a Class AA title in 1999. Moore resigned after the season, and Dave Sarra replaced him.
Sarra led Waynesburg back to the title game in 2000, but the program hasn't been the same since.
Well, Moore is back, and so is his enthusiasm. He replaced Joe Kuhns, who resigned after the 2011 season. Moore also brought back Sarra as his defensive coordinator. Sarra had a 45-26 record in seven seasons after Moore left.
“Dave is one of the best defensive coordinators in the WPIAL,” Moore said. “When we coached before, we had great athletes and a great team.”
A couple of lean seasons have hurt the program. Waynesburg has had only one winning season (6-4 in 2009) in the past five. It was 3-6 last season, losing the season finale to winless Brownsville, 20-19, and went 2-7 in 2010. The Raiders were 0-9 in '07 and 1-8 in '08.
“We had a lot of kids in the program before,” Moore said. “The numbers are down, and it's my job to get them up again.”
One way Moore is doing that is getting players involved in community activities.
“The community must know you're here,” Moore said.
Waynesburg returns only a couple starters: kicker Ian Patterson and linebacker Thad McGlinton.
“We have a lot of inexperience,” Moore said. “We graduated 18 seniors, so all the positions are opened.”
Players who have caught the coach's eye during workouts are sophomore quarterback Colby Collins, junior quarterback Bo Hampson, wide receiver Willy Ziefel, wingbacks Hunter Cenname and John-Glenn Davis and linemen Tyler and Thomas Ames.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.