Knoch tops Greensburg Salem, behind Tackett's four TDs
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Knoch earned a reputation for having an explosive offense en route to finishing as WPIAL Class AAA runner-up last season.
Senior running back Ben Tackett appears ready to do his share in keeping the Knights' offense clicking.
Tackett scored all four touchdowns for No. 8 Knoch in a 28-14 win over Greensburg Salem on Friday night in a Class AAA Greater Allegheny Conference opener at Knoch Knights Stadium.
Tackett provided most of the big plays for Knoch (1-0, 1-0). He returned a kickoff 93 yards for a TD late in the first quarter, rushed for 48 yards on 16 carries and two touchdowns, and caught a pair of passes for 17 yards and another score.
“I feel good about what I was able to do, but I have to remember there were 10 guys blocking on the kickoff return and 10 guys blocking on the touchdown runs and (quarterback) Dakota (Bruggeman) put the ball right on the money,” Tackett said.
To cap the first half with his team clinging to a 21-14 lead, Tackett intercepted a desperation pass into the end zone.
“Ben's competitive spirit abounds,” Knoch coach Mike King said. “It flows out of his ears.”
Senior tailback Tyler Shook rushed for 148 yards and a touchdown on 12 carries and had three receptions for 23 yards and a score to lead Greensburg Salem (0-1, 0-1). He broke loose for a 78-yard TD run early in the second quarter.
“He gives us some big-play potential, but we have to find more consistency,” Greensburg Salem coach Casey Cavanaugh said.
Greensburg Salem outgained Knoch, 268-119, but that didn't matter in the end. The Knights averaged 36 points per game last year as they put together one of the best seasons in school history by rolling to a 12-1 record.
Knoch claimed two interceptions and three fumble recoveries.
Paul Kogut is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-224-2696 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.