ShareThis Page

Uniontown's struggles with Ringgold continue

| Saturday, Sept. 22, 2012, 12:18 a.m.
Uniontown's Jordan Pratt (10) pulls down a pass and makes his way to the endzone in the first half of Uniontown's game against Ringgold held at Bill Power Stadium in Uniontown on Friday, September 21, 2012. Evan R. Sanders | Daily Courier

Playing catch-up did not suit Uniontown well Friday night.

The Raiders dug themselves holes at the beginning of each half and never recovered in a 30-13 loss to Ringgold in Big Nine Conference play at William Power Stadium.

The Rams' Demetrius Louis scored three touchdowns, the second coming on a 50-yard screen pass early in the third quarter that gave Ringgold a 22-7 lead. Louis also scored on runs of 1 and 83 yards.

In total, he carried the ball just 11 times but wound up with 261 yards.

“He's a great ball player,” Uniontown coach John Fortugna said. “I think he's Division I (caliber). If he doesn't break those two long runs, it's a different ballgame.”

Ringgold (3-1, 3-1) has won three straight after dropping its season opener to Thomas Jefferson. Uniontown lost for the third time in four games. Despite outplaying Ringgold for stretches, Uniontown took the loss.

“We had a lot of injuries tonight. We were playing a lot of kids who were clueless,” Ringgold coach Matt Humbert. “But I don't want to take anything away from Uniontown. They fought hard the entire game.”

Ringgold jumped to a 14-0 first-quarter lead on a 13-yard touchdown pass from Nico Law to Joey Wall and Louis' first touchdown, an 83-yard run. Uniontown's defense stiffened from there, and the Raiders finally put points on the board with the first half winding down.

With 52.6 seconds left, Uniontown forced a punt and took over at its 38-yard line. Three plays later, the Raiders faced second-and-11 from their 47 when Xavier Ellis dropped back and found Jordan Pratt behind the defense down the right slot. Ellis hit Jordan in stride at the Ringgold 10 and, just like that, Uniontown cut the Rams' lead in half.

But Ringgold regained momentum early in the second half when Humbert caught Uniontown blitzing and called for a dump-off to Louis, who needed just one block to turn a short pass into a long touchdown.

Trailing by 15, Uniontown moved 87 yards in 14 plays and cut into Ringgold's lead again when Ellis called his own number from 1 yard. The Raiders missed the extra point, making it 22-13.

Uniontown had one last gasp after stopping Ringgold on downs at the 20 early in the fourth. Uniontown moved to the Rams' 8 but, on third-and-4, Ellis fumbled, and Ringgold's Prenell Barner recovered.

On the next play, Louis dashed 90 yards to the Uniontown 1 and scored on the following play to seal the victory.

“It's nice to have a player like him, but we have to have more than one guy we can count on,” Humbert said.

Dave Stofcheck is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.