Share This Page

Indians dedicate stadium with win over Valley

| Wednesday, Sept. 19, 2012, 8:55 p.m.

Friday night marked the dedication of Shady Side Academy's Michael J. Farrell Stadium and despite some harrowing moments, the Indians made the evening even more special as they beat Valley, 16-6.

With star junior running backs Jared Brevard and Dennis Briggs out with ankle injuries, the Indians needed someone to step up.

And senior quarterback Matt Granato filled the bill.

He scored both of SSA's touchdowns on 12- and 20-yard runs and ended up with 103 yards on the ground.

His touchdown run in the third quarter broke a 6-6 deadlock.

Mike Pohl booted a 31-yard field goal in the fourth quarter to give the Indians some breathing room over a stubborn Valley team.

“We needed him to step up for us and he showed why he's such a valuable part of this team,” SSA coach Dave Havern said.

“He played a great game. Without Jared and Dennis, we needed Matt to complete some passes and he had some nice throws.

“A couple of his passes just missed being TDs.”

Havern will need Brevard and Briggs healthy next week as they travel to Burrell in a battle of unbeatens.

The Bucs held on to defeat Summit Academy 28-22 last week behind the running of Cole Bush and the passing of James Liput.

Bush rushed for 149 yards and a pair of scores, while Liput completed eight passes for 106 yards and a touchdown.

He also ran for a score.

“This will be our biggest challenge of the season,” Havern said. “Burrell is always a tough team and there will be a lot at stake here.

“I'm sure they'll have all their fans out in full force. We'll have to play a complete game.

“Our defense will have their work cut out for them. Cole Bush is a quality back and their quarterback has been very efficient.”

Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or mstewart@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.