The Norwin Knights are finally back in the win column.
Norwin (1-3, 1-3) broke a 12-game regular season losing streak — 13 including a playoff loss in 2010 — by defeating Latrobe, 27-14, at Norwin Stadium on Friday night in a Quad East matchup.
The victory was Norwin's first since defeating Penn-Trafford on Oct. 29, 2010.
“It feels good to get these kids a win,” Norwin coach Art Tragesser said.
Freshman quarterback Nick Amendola led the way for Norwin, scoring on a 2-yard run late in the second quarter to put the Knights up, 7-0.
Amendola followed with a 52-yard run on the fourth play of the second half, setting up Casey Rebsoky's 17-yard touchdown run 1:40 into the third quarter.
Trailing 14-0, Latrobe (1-3, 0-3) tried to make comeback. Senior quarterback Logan Carns scored on a 30-yard touchdown run with 1:15 remaining in the third quarter.
But Norwin had an answer. On the first play after the ensuing kickoff, Kyle Baum ran 73 yards for a touchdown to put Norwin back up by two scores, 21-7.
When Latrobe's Robert Vaskinko cut the lead to 21-14 with a 1-yard touchdown run in the fourth, Rebosky answered with an 80-yard touchdown run two plays later.
After letting a 7-0 lead slip away against McKeesport last week, Norwin was eager to put the game out of reach.
“That was definitely on our minds,” said Rebosky, who finished with eight catches for 102 yards. “We kept saying, ‘Not like McKeesport. Not again.' ”
Latrobe coach Ray Reitz credited Norwin's effort for the victory.
“Norwin deserved to win this game,” Reitz said. “I don't like to lose. But if I have to, I'm glad it was to (Art Tragesser).”
Ray Judy is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.