Conference rival hands SSA first loss
Last year, Shady Side Academy had it's way in a 35-7 Allegheny Conference win over Burrell.
The Buccaneers returned the favor last week with a 26-7 win at home.
The big difference was Burrell's Cole Bush.
Last year, SSA kept him under wraps. This time around, he rushed for 130 yards and three touchdowns and also turned in a highlight-reel defensive play.
It didn't help the Indians' cause that their own star running back, Jarred Brevard, tried to return after missing last week's game but lasted only one play. Backfield mate Dennis Briggs, also a casualty last week, returned to rush for 61 yards on five carries, including a 54-yard touchdown run.
“Neither one was near fully recovered,” SSA coach Dave Havern said. “Jarred's a tough kid and for him to ask to come out in a big game after one carry tells you that he was hurting.”
The Indians trailed 27-6 at the half and were on the verge of scoring as quarterback Matt Granato appeared to be on his way to a 60-yard touchdown run when Bush caught him from behind and stripped him of the ball.
“We knew going in that Bush was a great athlete and a playmaker,” Havern said. “He didn't disappoint. He makes big plays on both sides of the ball.”
This week, SSA will face a Freeport team that was stunned by Valley, 9-8, last week. It was Freeport's first loss of the season.
“That's just the way this conference is,” Havern said. “It's a different dogfight every week and it seems that you can always pencil every team in for one conference loss every year.
“We're hoping to be back at full strength in the backfield because Freeport will be a tough team, coming off a loss like that. They're a well-coached team and they'll be ready to play.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or email@example.com.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.