Valley wins again, downs East Allegheny
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Valley continues to look more at home in Class AA.
The Vikings won their second consecutive game, rolling over East Allegheny, 27-12, in an Allegheny Conference game Friday night.
Valley's big-play backs continued to lead the way. Senior Jaden Walker rushed for 154 yards and a touchdown. Junior Demetrius Houser racked up 145 yards rushing and two scores.
“This is a good team we played,” Valley coach Chad Walsh said. “There are a lot of athletes out there. We stuck to our game plan. We were able to run the football on them.”
Coupled with their defeat of then-No. 7 Freeport last week, Valley has momentum heading into the second half of the season.
“We're right where we want to be,” Walsh said. “We talked all week about needing to get to that 3-2 point. That puts us right in the middle of the conference fighting for a playoff berth.”
Houser said he doesn't mind splitting the carries if it gets his team to the postseason.
“I always like to share,” Houser said. “It takes a whole family to do what we need to do on the field.”
Houser put Valley on the board as time expired in the first quarter with a 39-yard touchdown run.
East Allegheny (1-4, 1-4) answered on the ensuing kickoff as KJ Marshall returned the ball 87 yards for a Wildcats touchdown.
Houser broke the 6-6 tie with a 7-yard touchdown run on Valley's next possession, and Ty Matthews gave the Vikings a 20-7 lead with a 54-yard touchdown pass to Chaz Cheatham late in the second quarter.
East Allegheny was poised to close the gap in the third quarter after a botched Valley snap went over the head of punter Jordan Frame.
The Wildcats took over at the Valley 4-yard line, but an ineligible receiver penalty backed the Wildcats to the 19. Marshall fumbled two plays later.
The Vikings then went on a 90-yard scoring drive capped by Walker's 9-yard touchdown run.
Ray Judy is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.