West Shamokin rolls past Leechburg
TribLIVE Sports Videos
West Shamokin used a strong running attack to rush by host Leechburg, 33-6, in a Class A Eastern Conference game.
Sophomore running back Andrew Wingard slashed and powered his way to 120 yards and three touchdowns on 27 carries for West Shamokin (2-6, 2-5).
The Wolves, despite dressing only 13 players, racked up 235 yards on the ground. Leechburg (1-7, 1-6), meantime, dropped its seventh straight.
“We jumped into that I-formation last week, and (Wingard) runs the ball hard,” West Shamokin coach Josh Gilliland said. “There were a lot of situations where he was gaining extra yards after contact. He's a heck of an athlete.”
In the second quarter, Leechburg broke a scoreless tie with a 13-play, 70-yard drive capped by junior Alex Kalmar's 4-yard touchdown run.
West Shamokin answered quickly, scoring 12 points on its next two possessions. Touchdown runs of 2 and 32 yards from Wingard gave the Wolves a 12-6 edge into halftime.
The Wolves continued to dominate the line of scrimmage in the second half, marching 50 yards on 10 plays in 5:21 to open the third quarter. Wingard capped the drive with a 2-yard touchdown run.
“When we kicked off, we wanted to try and hold them,” Leechburg coach Mark George said. “We thought it was very important to keep ourselves mentally and emotionally in the game by holding them. They ate up a lot of clock and scored. At that point, it was tough for the kids to come back.”
With the score 27-6 early in the fourth quarter and Leechburg clinging to slim hope of a comeback, West Shamokin junior defensive back Brady Cornman intercepted a pass by senior Tyler Dubovi. Then, West Shamokin sophomore running back Zac Horner raced 41 yards for a touchdown to complete the scoring.
D.J. Vasil is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.