ShareThis Page

High school football notebook: Backup QBs make impact

Bill Beckner Jr.
| Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012, 11:55 p.m.
2012 Burrell quarterback Cody Wolfe.
Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review
2012 Burrell quarterback Cody Wolfe. Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review

Dan Farinelli's sophomore season had been relegated to practice snaps and second-team reps.

Junior Cody Wolfe was seeing time at wide receiver and had become more concerned with catching passes than throwing them.

How quickly things can change.

Both became starting quarterbacks when teammates suffered injuries in recent weeks — Farinelli at Valley and Wolfe at Burrell.

Farinelli got the start last week after third-year starter Ty Matthews underwent surgery to remove his appendix.

Wolfe took over two weeks ago when James Liput suffered a concussion in the first quarter against Freeport.

Both are 1-0 as starters.

Farinelli completed 6 of 11 passes for 118 yards with two touchdowns to senior wideout Chaz Cheatham in a 22-16 win over Summit Academy.

Wolfe started slow in relief against Freeport, throwing three interceptions, but was steady in a 17-10 win at Ford City. He was 5 of 8 for 89 yards and a TD.

Liput has been cleared to return, but Matthews could be out for an extended period of time.

“I took reps when Ty was around, and I tried to learn,” Farinelli said. “I was third string last year and didn't really get to do much.”

Wolfe isn't new to big plays. He had an 80-yard kickoff return for a touchdown against Shady Side Academy.

Liput has been impressed with Wolfe.

“He got thrown in against the best defense in the conference, so think it is unfair to judge him from that game,” Liput said.

Farinelli, the grandson of former Valley coach Ray “Whizzer” White, was one of the players affected by the loss of a junior high program for a season. But he is catching up.

“I think I will be ready (this week),” he said. “My offensive line had some great blocking for me.”

Playoff picture

With two weeks left in the regular season, only two Alle-Kiski area teams has clinched playoff berths.

Freeport (6-1) and Burrell (6-1), who are aiming to lock up the Allegheny Conference title, are headed to the Class AA postseason.

The Yellowjackets shared conference titles in 2009 and ‘11.

The WPIAL's elaborate tiebreaker system, which uses head-to-head competition, Gardner Points and then point-differential, to decide qualifiers, will come into play soon and will help decide other local teams' fates.

The top five teams in each Class AAAA and AAA conference qualify, along with one wild card team.

In Class AA and A, the top four teams advance.

In all classes, the top two teams from each conference host first-round games. The quarterfinals and semifinals are at neutral sites, with the finals set for either Nov. 23 or Nov. 24 at Heinz Field.

Dugan nearing mark

Springdale running back Sean Dugan has 3,724 yards, just 150 yards short of the record set by Wayne Mundekis (2002-05).

Dugan needs 276 yards to become just the third player in A-K history to rush for 4,000 yards, joining Riverview's Lucas Heakins (1996-98) and Valley's Brandon Williams (1995-97).

200 club

There was a time when 100-yard rushing games were an achievement. But local backs are making 200-yard efforts the standard.

A-K ball-carriers have rushed for 200 or more yards nine times this season. Springdale's Dugan and Burrell's Cole Bush have done it three times each.

Knoch's Ben Tackett, Highlands' Elijah Jackson and Freeport quarterback Brendan Lynch each have accomplished the feat once.

Bill Beckner Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.