ShareThis Page

Gateway locks up Quad East title

| Friday, Oct. 19, 2012, 10:48 p.m.
Gateway's Darin Franklin blows past Penn-Trafford defenseman  Ryan Marasti during a game at Penn-Trafford on Friday, October 19, 2012.
Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Gateway's Darin Franklin blows past Penn-Trafford defenseman Ryan Marasti during a game at Penn-Trafford on Friday, October 19, 2012. Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review

A game that last year went down to the final play was a first-half blowout this season.

Gateway left no doubt as to who is the best team in the Quad East Conference: The second-ranked Gators scored early and often to win, 42-0, at No. 10 Penn-Trafford on Friday night.

Thomas Woodson led the Gators (7-1, 7-0) with 322 yards and three touchdowns on 10-for-14 passing, although the senior Arizona recruit threw his first interception of the season. The victory clinched Gateway's first conference title since 2009.

“It's the first goal accomplished. We wanted to get the conference championship back, and that's the first of our three big goals (of conference, WPIAL and state titles),” Gateway coach Terry Smith said.

Last year, Penn-Trafford (6-2, 6-1) won the old Quad South Conference by beating Gateway on a last-second field goal, 16-14. This year's Warriors will finish second in the Quad East and host a playoff game in two weeks, but there was no such suspense in this year's game against Gateway.

The Gators took the opening kickoff and went on their longest drive of the game, an 11-play, 85-yard push that ended with a 1-yard touchdown run by Darin Franklin.

A 30-yard strike from Woodson to Delvon Randall added to the lead, and Mileak Ford intercepted a pass by Penn-Trafford's Dorian Stevens and returned it 21 yards to put Gateway ahead, 21-0, just two plays into the second quarter.

Penn-Trafford's offense got three first downs on its first drive, but the Warriors were limited to 94 yards for the game. Devin Austin had 51 yards on 10 carries.

“We knew every play that they were going to run,” Smith said. “We made adjustments, and (our coaches) did a great job scouting Penn-Trafford.”

“(Gateway) executed, and that's what you have to do to win,” Penn-Trafford coach John Ruane said. “I thought our defense didn't play as bad as it looked, but I think our offense hurt us more by not being able to control the ball, move the ball and score.”

Gateway's offense moved down the field with big plays. Woodson completed five passes of 30 yards or longer.

Montae Nicholson was the Gators' leading receiver with 109 yards on two catches, but he left the game with an injury after turning a screen pass into a 54-yard gain. Franklin led the Gateway rushing attack with 75 yards on eight carries, including a 38-yarder.

A 53-yard connection from Woodson to Todd Jeter made it 35-0 before halftime, which put the running clock into effect. Gateway maintained control in the second half, although a pair of fumbles kept the Gators from increasing their lead.

The only second-half score from Gateway came from the defense, when Jeter intercepted a pass at the 15-yard line and advanced inside the 5. Jeter fumbled, but Jaymar Parrish was there to scoop up the ball and carry it the rest of the way to the end zone.

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.