Trib HS Insider Q&A: Clairton's Tyler Boyd
Clairton's Tyler Boyd carries for a 48-yard touchdown against Bishop Canevin during the second quarter Saturday October 13, 2012 at Dormont Stadium.
Photo by Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Senior Tyler Boyd is the face of the Clairton football program, which has won a nation-leading 55 consecutive games. The Bears lost the first game of Boyd's career when he was a freshman. They haven't lost since.
A highly recruited player, with Division I offers from schools around the country, Boyd has rushed for more than 4,000 career yards and is closing in on 100 career touchdowns.
He is the reigning state Class A player of the year and is the first Class A player from the WPIAL to be selected for the U.S. Army All-American Bowl.
This season, Boyd has rushed for 1,189 yards and 19 touchdowns on 93 carries for the top-ranked Bears (8-0, 8-0).
Q: You're approaching 100 touchdowns for your career. What does that mean to you?
A: It means a lot. I don't even know if that's ever been done. So yeah, it definitely means a lot. I'm aware of it.
Q: Your coach, Tom Nola, is a man of few words. Is it tempting to laugh during his pregame speeches?
A: Oh yeah, sometimes. When he's being real serious, that's when sometimes he says something really funny.
Q: Clairton has won 55 straight games. Can anyone beat you guys?
A: Only if we beat ourselves.
Q: Notre Dame, Ohio State, UCLA, WVU, Pitt and Penn State all want you. Are you distracted?
A: Nah, not really. It's honestly not as bad now as it was during the summer.
Q: Do you have it narrowed down to a top 5 yet?
A: Not yet. I'm still working on it.
Q: Is Clairton the best program in WPIAL history?
A: I'd have to say yes just because of the fact that we always have athletes, every year, and it's so hard for any team to ever stop us.
Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.