Share This Page

Birdie hears it from his readers

| Thursday, Oct. 25, 2012, 12:01 a.m.

The Birdie has taken plenty of heat for his “struggles.”

A less-than-stellar season has even the most beloved fans of the small-game sultan questioning his prognosticating skills.

The football guru went 11-1 last Friday and was crowned Chicken Dance champion at a wedding on Saturday.

But that seems like little consolation to some spoiled readers, who still doubt his skills.

Here are some excerpts from emails, tweets and phone messages:

• “Your getting too old for this, Birdie. Time to retire to your cabin in the woods.”

• “Hey Birdie, your picks need auto correct.”

• “Expert? More like professional guesser.”

• “Are you from Burrell?”

• “My 3-year-old knew Valley was going to win.”

• “A weatherman is right more times than you.”

The Birdie admits he was a little off on his preseason predictions. For instance, he had Valley going 2-7 and missing the playoffs. Valley is 6-2 and postseason-bound.

“Unlike my golf matches with the part-timers, I don't get breakfast balls or mulligans,” the Birdie said. “I make my picks and stay with them. Some teams rise above the expected, which is what makes football so great. If I got every game right, life would be boring.”

He also was off on marks for Deer Lakes, Ford City and Kittanning.

“Even I, being so great and revered, make miscalculations,” he said. “I know how coaches feel. You spend hours watching game film, researching the net and sniffing around practices, yet nothing is guaranteed. Sometimes, you're left scratching your head.”

Still, the Birdie is ready to pick playoff games. He appreciates readers taking him so seriously, and loves their feedback.

“If it wasn't for you fine fans, I'd be in a pet store somewhere singing Nicki Manaj for peanuts,” he said. “Your feedback makes my day.”

Hoping the WPIAL tiebreaker system doesn't have to be used, because he stills doesn't get it, The Birdie offers Week 9 picks:

Seneca Valley (7-1, 5-1) at Fox Chapel (1-7, 1-5)

The Foxes want a win to close the season, but Seneca Valley is gearing up for the playoffs.

Seneca Valley, 28-7.

Kiski Area (3-5, 3-4) at Latrobe (2-6, 1-6)

Kiski Area needs this to close the season on an upbeat note.

Kiski Area, 24-14

Plum (0-8) at Pine-Rich. (3-5)

Plum's rough season in the new Quad A has to end.

Pine-Richland, 27-13

Knoch (6-2, 5-2) at Highlands (4-4, 3-4)

Underrated when it comes to local matchups, Highlands' defense will slow the Knights down ... some.

Knoch, 24-14

Apollo-Ridge (5-3, 5-2) at West Shamokin (2-6, 2-5)

Apollo-Ridge needs an exclamation point to cap a strong first season back in Class A.

Apollo-Ridge, 28-10

Deer Lakes (3-5, 2-5) at Burrell (7-1, 6-1)

Burrell's Cole Train is set to pull into the playoff station.

Burrell, 27-12

Valley (6-2, 5-2) at Ford City (3-5, 2-5)

Valley will be known as the team that baffled the Birdie in 2012.

Valley, 19-13

Shady Side Academy (4-3, 4-2) at Kittanning (4-4, 4-3)

Two similar teams battling for playoff position. Defense wins.

Kittanning, 20-14

Summit Academy (2-5, 1-5) at Freeport (6-2, 6-1)

Freeport caps a solid regular season with a home victory.

Freeport, 26-14

Riverview (2-6, 2-5) at Springdale (5-3, 5-2)

The Lower Valley's finest bowl game goes to the Dynamos.

Springdale, 31-15

Leechburg (1-7, 1-6) at North Catholic (6-2, 6-1)

Schedule not kind to the Blue Devils, throwing in the Trojans in the finale.

North Catholic, 35-8

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.