Share This Page

Gateway shuts out Penn-Trafford to clinch conference

| Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2012, 8:56 p.m.
(c) 2012 Lillian DeDomenic
Warriors quarterback Dorian Stevens is dragged down by Gateway linebacker David Wimbish during Penn-Trafford's loss at home against the Gators on Friday, Oct. 19, 2012. Lillian DeDomenic | For The Penn-Trafford Star

Penn-Trafford's reign atop its conference has come to an end.

No. 2 Gateway scored on its first five possessions and cruised the rest of the way to its first conference title in three years by defeating No. 10 Penn-Trafford, 42-0, on senior night last Friday at Warriors Stadium.

Quarterback Thomas Woodson led the Gators (7-1, 7-0) with 322 yards passing and three touchdowns, while the Penn-Trafford (6-2, 6-1) offense was limited to just 94 yards in the game, 51 of which came on the ground from Devin Austin.

The Gateway offense came out fast, and despite a near interception by P-T's Brendan Reddy on the first play from scrimmage, the Gators marched 85 yards in 11 plays, including two long pass plays, to set up a 1-yard scoring run by Darin Franklin.

The Warriors put together a 10-play drive of their own to answer, but they reached only as far as the Gateway 36-yard line and were forced to punt.

Woodson then connected on a 55-yard pass to Montae Nicholson and a 30-yard scoring pass to Delvon Randall to put the Gators firmly in control, 14-0.

“They really killed us with their pass game early on,” Penn-Trafford coach John Ruane said. “I felt like we were in position; we just didn't make some plays. (Gateway) has been throwing the ball deep all year, and until someone stops it, they're going to keep doing it. Hats off to Tommy (Woodson); he had a great night.”

P-T's opening drive would be its longest of the half, as the Gateway defense tightened. Mileak Ford intercepted a pass by P-T's Dorian Stevens and returned it for the game's third touchdown, and the Warriors would manage only one more first down until the second half.

“(Gateway) executed, and that's what you've got to do to win,” Ruane said. “I thought our defense didn't play as bad as it looked. I thought our offense hurt us more by not controlling the ball and scoring, but I take credit for that. I've got to have a better game plan in place.”

The loss snapped a 12-game conference winning streak for Penn-Trafford that dated back to the 2010 season finale against Norwin.

The Warriors do get a chance to rebound before the playoffs when they go on the road this Friday for a 7 p.m. start at Hempfield (4-4, 4-3).

The Spartans are led by a tandem of talented quarterbacks in Ty George and the more run-oriented DeLorian Day, and the team is coming off a 42-8 win over Norwin last week.

Although Penn-Trafford is securely locked into the second spot in the conference, Hempfield will be pushing hard to improve its playoff seeding with a quality win that could move the Spartans past McKeesport for third place.

“We want to get some momentum back,” Ruane said. “We have a home playoff game here in two weeks, and though we don't know who it's going to be, it's going to be tough, regardless.

“Hempfield is a good team that has really changed its fortunes, but we need to get back on track. It's good that we play anybody (this) week before the playoffs.”

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or mgrubba@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.