Share This Page

No. 13 Neshannock upsets Monessen

| Friday, Nov. 9, 2012, 11:50 p.m.
Jim Ference/The Valley Independent
Monessen's Clintell Gillaspie, shown in last year's playoff game against Neshannock, will be called on to have another big game against the Lancers tonight.

The Monessen fight song was playing after the hard-fought battle between the No. 5 Greyhounds and No. 13 Neshannock.

Sadly, though, the mantra was being played for Neshannock, who share it as its fight song, by the Lancers band celebrating Neshannock's 24-21 come-from-behind, last-second win over the Greyhounds in the WPIAL Class A quarterfinals.

The Lancers drove 60 yards in just over two minutes and scored on an Ernie Burkes' dive from the 1-yard line with four seconds remaining to send the underdog Lancers (10-1) to a WPIAL semifinal date with No. 1 Clairton.

“We were out here, still trying to earn respect, and our boys fought to the very end,” Neshannock coach Fred Mozzocio said. “No one gave us a chance in this game.”

It looked as if the Lancers' dream season was going to come to a close when Greyhounds' quarterback Chavas Rawlins hit Clintell Gillaspie on fourth down for a 20-yard touchdown pass to give Monessen a 21-17 lead.

Neshannock's Kienan Owens returned the ensuing squib kick to the Lancers' 40.

Nine plays and 40 yards later, the Lancers were staring down the end of their season with a 4th-and-10 from the Greyhounds' 20.

“During that timeout, I told the guys, ‘We're going to get this first down and we're going to win this ball game,'” Mozzocio said.

Burkes kept the drive alive by finding John Conglose for a 19-yard gain to the Monessen 1.

“The kid made a hell of a play on that pass,” Greyhounds coach Andy Pacak said. “It wasn't like we had someone out of position, they made the play. I mean ... it was a great high school football game.”

Gillaspie finished with 174 total yards, including 19 carries for 109 rushing yards.

After Eli Owens intercepted a Rawlins pass, Connor Richards booted a 22-yard field goal to give the Lancers a 3-0 first-quarter lead. The drive was aided by a roughing the kicker penalty called on the Greyhounds' Raymond Dickerson, who hit Lancers' quarterback-punter, Burkes. The snap appeared to hit the turf, which is a fumble, but the referees threw the flag.

“I thought that when the punter picked it up, he looked as if he was going to run. He made a football move,” Pacak said. “But the call was made. And that was that.”

Five plays later, the Lancers kicked the 22-yard field goal, which would later prove to be the winning margin.

“I'm not going to say that call cost us the game,” Pacak said. “They made plays and we rebounded from that.”

Jeremy Sellew is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at jsellew@tribweb.com

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.