Clairton's Howard to sit out title game
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Titus Howard always figured he would finish his high school football career with his Clairton teammates at Hersheypark Stadium.
He just assumed he would be in pads.
Howard received the news he had dreaded Monday when a doctor wouldn't medically clear him to play in the PIAA Class A championship game at 1 p.m. Friday against District 2 champion Dunmore (14-1). The Pitt recruit dislocated his elbow Nov. 30 in the first half of Clairton's 53-0 win over Berlin Brothersvalley in the state quarterfinals.
“They said on my MRI that there was a lot of damage,” Howard said. “There were just a lot of little tears, but it wasn't serious enough for me to have to have surgery. But it was serious enough for them to tell me not to play this weekend.”
Howard sat out the Bears' 44-12 victory over Port Allegany in the PIAA Class A semifinals last weekend. It was the first time the senior wide receiver didn't play in a high school game.
Now he will be have to watch again as Clairton (15-0) tries to extend its state-record winning streak to 63 games.
“That's a bad feeling because there's no doubt I want to be out there with the team,” Howard said. “I just wish I was able to be out there again with them.”
Howard was second on the team this season with 21 catches, 536 yards and five touchdowns. He also was a cornerback on Clairton's “Killer-Ts” defensive backfield made up of three Division I prospects in Howard, cornerback Terrish Webb (Kent State) and uncommitted free safety Tyler Boyd.
Without Howard, the Clairton defense held Port Allegany quarterback Matt Bodamer, the state's all-time passing leader, to 192 yards and a late touchdown. Boyd intercepted Bodamer's first pass, and Webb picked him off in the final minute of the first half.
Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 412-664-9161 Ext. 1977.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.