ShareThis Page

Clairton wide receiver Boyd commits to Pitt

| Saturday, Jan. 5, 2013, 1:42 p.m.
Clairton's Tyler Boyd.
Christopher Horner  |  Tribune-Review
Christopher Horner
Clairton's Tyler Boyd. Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Tyler Boyd, Clairton - 2012 Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Terrific 25
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Christopher Horner
Tyler Boyd, Clairton - 2012 Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Terrific 25 Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review

It may have taken a couple of extra weeks, but Pitt finally landed a highly recruited WPIAL wide receiver.

At least for now.

Clairton's Tyler Boyd made a verbal commitment to Pitt on Saturday during the first quarter of the U.S. Army All-American Bowl at Alamodome in San Antonio, just two weeks after Central Valley's Robert Foster surprised many by choosing Alabama over Pitt.

However, Boyd, who has about 30 scholarship offers, still plans to take at least two more official visits — to Michigan State and Tennessee — over the next four weeks.

He will visit Michigan State on Jan. 18 and has yet to confirm a date to visit Tennessee.

Verbal commitments are nonbinding until signing day Feb. 6. Boyd said he will make his decision final following those last two visits.

Even though a long shot to land Boyd, Penn State coach Bill O'Brien has asked for a face-to-face meeting before signing day.

“(Pitt) felt right,” Boyd said. “I'm just trying to help my city get more exposure and try to win a championship.”

Boyd's only official visit was to Pitt in November. He has taken unofficial visits to Penn State, West Virginia, Southern Cal and Ohio State.

Flanked by his mother, Tonya Payne, Clairton coach Tom Nola and others, Boyd selected a Pitt hat over West Virginia and Michigan State during the nationally televised game.

Boyd started at receiver for the East squad and finished with one catch for 4 yards. He was targeted on a deep ball, but it fell incomplete.

The East beat the West, 15-8.

Boyd became the 22nd commitment for Pitt's 2013 recruiting class and sixth from the WPIAL — Clairton defensive back Titus Howard, South Fayette receiver Zach Challingsworth, Belle Vernon offensive lineman Dorian Johnson, Seton-La Salle tight end Scott Orndoff and Gateway tight end Jaymar Parrish are the others. Boyd, ranked as a four-star recruit by many recruiting services, was one of the most sought-after players in the WPIAL after leading Clairton to a state-record 63 consecutive wins, including four straight WPIAL and state championships.

Boyd (6-foot-2, 175 pounds) was forced to play running back the past two years out of necessity and put together two stellar seasons.

He rushed for 2,584 yards, caught 12 passes for 218 yards and scored 51 touchdowns this past season. He was named the Tribune-Review and Pennsylvania Sportswriters Class A player of the year.

Boyd finished his career with 5,755 yards rushing, good for fifth place on the WPIAL all-time list. He also set a district record with 117 career touchdowns.

Boyd could push for playing time right away at Pitt. The Panthers lose two of their top receivers from this year's team in Mike Shanahan and Cameron Saddler.

Boyd already has qualified academically to compete as a freshman.

His verbal commitment makes four Clairton players at Pitt — Boyd, Howard, Trenton Coles and Kevin Weatherspoon. Terrish Webb was offered a scholarship in November and soon is expected to make a verbal commitment to the Panthers.

“All my brothers are at Pitt,” Boyd said. “I am just trying to join the family.”

Staff writer Jerry DiPaola contributed. Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.