Local players secure all-state honors
By Staff Reports
Published: Monday, Jan. 7, 2013, 11:32 p.m.
Several local football players have earned all-state recognition by the Pennsylvania Football News..
Mt. Pleasant's Eli Holt and Tyler Mellors, and Frazier's Jaime Fell and Uniontown's Johnathan Hager were each honored.
Fell, a senior, was selected as a wide receiver for the second-team offense in Class A. He led the Commodores with 47 catches for 878 yards and nine touchdowns. Fell helped Frazier finish with a 7-3 record that included a trip to the WPIAL Class A playoffs for the second consecutive season.
The Red Raiders' Hager, a senior, was selected to the second-team defense in Class AAA. Hager was chosen as a punter who averaged nearly 50 yards per punt during the 2012 season. In a game against West Mifflin, Hager connected for a punt of 70 yards.
Holt, a senior, had another strong season at inside linebacker for the Vikings and was picked for the third-team defense in Class AA. Holt was the team's leading tackler for a second straight season, finishing with 120 tackles. He also had two fumble recoveries and a sack.
The Vikings' Mellors, a junior running back, was a Class AA honorable mention. Mellors paced Mt. Pleasant's ground game with 1,490 yards and 25 rushing touchdowns on 173 carries. He also caught six passes for 50 yards.
Mellors and Holt helped Mt. Pleasant post an 8-3 record, which included the team's first WPIAL playoff victory since 2009.
— Staff reports
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.