Share This Page

Knoch QB Bruggeman picks W. Va. D-II school

| Saturday, Feb. 2, 2013, 10:08 p.m.
Knoch football player Dakota Bruggeman. Erica Hilliard | Valley News Dispatch

Senior Dakota Bruggeman played a number of positions for the Knoch football team over the years. He lined up at wide receiver, played cornerback and even handled the punting duties.

But quarterback always was his favorite, and that's where he saw himself playing in college.

Alderson-Broaddus College was willing to give him that chance, so Bruggeman accepted, giving the school from Phillipi, W.Va., a verbal commitment.

Bruggeman received a few calls from Penn State, and believed a preferred walk-on offer was forthcoming. But that plan fizzled, so he narrowed his choices to Alderson-Broaddus and Concord. Both are Division II schools. D-II Indiana (Pa.) also showed strong interest.

“Penn State said their roster was full,” said Bruggeman, who passed for 1,264 yards and 10 touchdowns last season. “I went down (to Alderson-Broaddus) for a visit and it matches me perfectly. I want to get into nursing and they have the top program in the state.

“I love playing quarterback, and they'll give me the chance to play it.”

The 6-foot-4, 205-pound Bruggeman, who also intercepted five passes for the Knights last season, was a key player on Knoch's WPIAL runner-up in 2011.

Nursing has been an interest of Bruggeman's for some time.

“I like helping people,” he said. “It gives me a good feeling to help someone out.”

Bill Beckner Jr. is the Local Sports Editor of the Valley News Dispatch. He can be reached at bbeckner@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.