Baldwin has a new football coach, but the decision didn't come without some discussion and dissension Wednesday night.
The Baldwin-Whitehall board of directors voted 6-3 to hire the high school's dean of students, Pete Wagner Jr., to replace Jim Wehner, who resigned last month. That vote came after board members denied a recommendation to hire Seton-La Salle coach Greg Perry by a 5-4 vote.
“(Wagner) has worked with the kids. He knows the kids,” board director Ray Rosing said. “When are we going to give somebody a chance?”
Wagner was Baldwin's offensive coordinator this past season and also has been an assistant coach at Seton-La Salle and Montour. He played at Valley Forge Military Academy and Morehead State University.
Perry is 60-20 in eight seasons at Seton-La Salle, where he also was the offensive coordinator for 10 seasons prior. The Rebels have won six conference titles and two WPIAL championships during his tenure.
The West Shamokin football team will have a familiar face in change next season, as defensive coordinator Jon McCullough was promoted to head coach this week, replacing Josh Gilliland, who resigned after last season.
“I had confidence that they'd look at the in-house candidates, especially with the progress we've made,” said McCullough, 33. “We're going to be a team that plays hard for all 48 minutes and doesn't beat itself. I think we'll put a product on the field that everybody can be proud of.”
WPIAL teams still without a football coach include Bishop Canevin, California, Canon-McMillan, Gateway, Freedom, Hollidaysburg, North Hills, Northgate, Pine-Richland, Plum, Serra Catholic and Southmoreland.
— Staff reports
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.