High school roundup: North Hills hires assistant coach to replace Jack McCurry
By Staff Reports
Published: Monday, Feb. 18, 2013, 9:45 p.m.
North Hills hired Pat Carey as head football coach Monday, choosing the veteran assistant to replace Jack McCurry in a long-expected move.
A 1988 North Hills graduate, Carey had been the Indians' assistant head coach and defensive coordinator since 1998. McCurry, one of the WPIAL's most successful coaches, resigned in January after 35 seasons.
Carey was the AFLAC National Assistant Coach of the Year in 2003. Before becoming assistant head coach, Carey instructed outside linebackers and receivers.
“Pat Carey has been an integral part of North Hills football for 17 seasons,” North Hills superintendent Patrick J. Mannarino said in a statement announcing the hire. “There is no doubt that he is the perfect person to lead our athletes and continue the program's tradition of excellence.”
Carey captained North Hills' undefeated 1987 team that finished first in national rankings by USA Today. A four-year letterman at James Madison, Carey has taught health and physical education classes at North Hills since 1994.
McCurry had a 281-108-9 record and four WPIAL titles.
“Pat Carey fits the mold of what is a long line of outstanding coaches at North Hills,” athletic director Dan Cardone said. “The foundation, which he helped establish, is in place ... to have a long and successful tenure.”
Perry 80, Obama Academy 79 (OT) — Devin Lyles scored 19 points including the winning free throws with eight seconds left in overtime to give Perry (12-12) a win in the City League semifinals. D.J. Porter had 26 for top-seeded Obama (16-3).
Westinghouse 68, Brashear 47 — Robert Bailey scored 30 points to guide No. 3 Westinghouse (14-8) to a victory in the City League semifinals.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.