Bentworth's Bizet to Alderson-Broaddus
John Bizet's commitment to Alderson-Broaddus College was a decision he knew would shape more than just his college career, but the foundation for his next 40 years.
The Bentworth senior's determination to play football at the collegiate level led to his decision to join NCSA Athletic Recruiting, a Chicago-based exclusive recruiting network that provides student athletes with the opportunity and technology to be proactive in their recruiting process.
Not only did Bizet (6-5, 320) have the tools he needed for the recruiting process, NCSA also educated him on the steps he needed to take to achieve his goal.
The offensive tackle picked Alderson-Broaddus College over schools such as Robert Morris, Marietta, Gannon, Bethany and Westminster.
“I really liked the campus and it is a good Division-II school,” Bizet said. “I think it's a good place for me.”
Bizet demonstrated the true meaning of “student-athlete” by working hard for a 3.0 GPA while also standing out on the gridiron. A two-year starter for the Bearcats, Bizet plans to pursue a degree at the private, liberal arts college in Philippi, W. Va.
His self-motivation and trust in the recruiting process has rewarded him with the opportunity to play football as an Alderson-Broaddus Battler and earn a meaningful degree that will help him succeed in the future.
Bizet also praised the help he received from NCSA.
“I was looking around the Internet for help with colleges and I found them,” he said of the service. “I was happy with the help they gave me.”
Bizet is the son of Joe and Jeannette Bizet of Scenery Hill.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.