High school notebook: Vincentian football coach to appeal suspension to PIAA
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Vincentian Academy football coach Tim Storino has asked the PIAA to overturn his one-year suspension levied by the WPIAL, which has accused him of recruiting athletes from Catholic grade schools.
Storino, head coach for one year, was found last month to have violated rules when he visited several youth football teams and encouraged them to consider Vincentian. The WPIAL board granted Storino a rehearing Feb. 6, but the league's decision didn't change.
“I don't think anybody thought what (Storino) did he did intentionally,” WPIAL executive director Tim O'Malley said, “but the opinion of the board was that he was in violation.”
Partly at issue was the feeder system used by Catholic schools, and whether the schools Storino visited were part of Vincentian Academy's system.
“They're all within two minutes of the school,” Storino said. “The only thing I did was I went to those youth football teams and let the kids know we now have a football team at Vincentian — it's brand new — and invited some kids to an open house. That's all that was done. Apparently, you're not allowed to do that, is what they're telling us.”
The WPIAL maintains no official list of feeder schools, O'Malley said. The diocese can submit a feeder list to the PIAA, but Vincentian's most recent was several years old. Storino expects the PIAA to hear his case in March.
• The board approved section alignments for winter sports in the 2013-14 school year. Being the second year of the league's two-year cycle, there were few changes. The Laurel Highlands wrestling program returned, while Shady Side Academy and Highlands dropped theirs.
• The WPIAL again denied an appeal by Sewickley Academy's Hunter Ligo for an extra year of eligibility in lacrosse, a ruling to be appealed to the PIAA.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.