Plum hires ex-Pitt, NFL player Morgan as coach
Matt Morgan reached the pinnacle of football.
After a successful career at Plum, he started four seasons for Pitt, then suited up for the Rams and the Bills in the NFL.
Now, Morgan has accepted the task of trying to turn around the football program at his alma mater.
Morgan was hired as Mustangs football coach Tuesday night by an 8-0 vote.
“It's pretty exciting,” Morgan said. “I had been pacing back and forth all day; I thought I was in the NFL again.”
Morgan replaces Frank Sacco, who coached the Mustangs the past four seasons and compiled a 10-28 record.
Sacco's teams reached the WPIAL playoffs in 2009 and '10, but the Mustangs have struggled the past two seasons.
The 1999 Plum graduate was an assistant coach at Gateway the past three seasons.
“We needed a change in direction,” school board member Kevin Dowdell said. “He will bring enthusiasm to the kids. The change will be good for the kids.”
“I want to thank Coach Sacco for all the hard work and dedication he put into the program and the groundwork he laid for the program,” board member Joe Tommarello said.
The Mustangs have lost their last 16 games, a school record.
“I know we've only won one game the past two years, but I ultimately have to get the kids believing in football in this district,” Morgan said.
Morgan plans to meet with prospective players Wednesday.
With former Gateway coach Terry Smith leaving the school for a position with Temple University, it frees his former assistants to go elsewhere.
“I know some very solid guys coming with me from Gateway,” Morgan said as he begins the search for a staff. “One of Terry's strengths was structuring Gateway like a college or NFL team. I've learned a lot from him.”
Trib Total Media staff writer Karen Zapf contributed to this story. George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.