Two Gateway players nominated for national all-star football game
Gateway is no stranger to having seniors take part in the U.S. Army All-American Bowl in San Antonio, Texas.
Justin King, Shayne Hale, Dorian Bell and Corey Brown played in the game over the past decade before moving on to Division I schools.
Two Gateway rising seniors who continue to be recruited heavily by Division I colleges — defensive backs Montae Nicholson and Anthony Davis — have been nominated to play in the 2014 game on Jan. 4.
The East versus West matchup will be televised live on NBC.
“These nominations recognize the mental, emotional and physical strengths, as well as the leadership qualities the nominees possess both on and off the field,” said Mark S. Davis, deputy assistant secretary of the Army for marketing.
There are nine nominations from Pennsylvania, including five from the WPIAL.
In addition to Nicholson and Davis, WPIAL nominees are Bethel Park offensive lineman Mike Grimm, Washington running back Shai McKenzie and Monessen linebacker Justice Rawlins.
The athletes were nominated by the U.S. Army All-American Bowl Selection Committee, which consists of All-American Games, 247Sports — the bowl's official online recruiting network — and All-American Games' network of regional coaches throughout the country.
Of the 400 nominees, 90 will be selected and invited to the game.
The next step for the nominees occurs in September when the U.S. Army All-American Bowl Selection Tour begins. Player finalists will be announced nationwide through the fall, with the selection tour ending in early December.
The 2013 game drew a record crowd of 40,133 to the Alamodome.
For more information on the U.S. Army All-American Bowl and its related events, visit www.usarmyallamericanbowl.com.
Michael Love is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5825 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.