Knoch lineman intends to let recruiting process play itself out
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Lineman Connor Shinsky isn't in a rush to make his college football decision. In fact, he wants to prove that he is a Division I talent and let the rest take care of itself.
“I'm thinking I might decide around midseason,” said Shinsky, who will be a senior at Knoch. “I'd like to let a couple of coaches see me play first.”
Quite a change of pace in an age where players sell themselves to high-ranking programs at prospect camps around the country while wearing shorts and sleeveless T-shirts.
Shinsky wants to prove his worth in full pads. He already has three Division I scholarship offers: Kent State, Texas at El Paso and St. Francis (Pa.). More could be on the way.
“He is very focused on making this season his best because he is dead-set on playing football at the highest level possible,” Knoch coach Mike King said.
Agile for his size, the 6-foot-6, 260-pounder who plays offensive tackle and defensive end, is just another hefty lineman to come out of Knoch. Every year, the roster swells with up-front girth.
“It must be something in the water up here,” said Shinsky with a laugh.
Shinsky turned heads last season as a key run-blocker for Knoch's speedy backfield that included 1,171-yard, 19-touchdown tailback Ben Tackett.
“I started to get attention around mid-season last year,” Shinsky said. “It was after the Franklin Regional game on Root Sports. Two days after that, Penn State and Virginia called. It picked up as the season went on.”
A third-year starter, Shinskly is a mainstay on the offensive line but often times blends into the pile and is out of view when a ball-carrier bursts free.
His true personality comes out on defense.
“He is one of the very few linemen I have coached that is able to perform on a high level on both sides of the ball,” King said.
Watch Shinsky play a few downs on defense, and you'll wonder if it's the same kid who enjoys lazy, Saturday mornings fishing in a row boat.
He'll be the lone returning starter on the defensive line this fall, the veteran of the 3-5 set and the guy destined to see double-teams.
“There's nothing better than sacking a quarterback,” Shinsky said. “(College coaches) say they like my intensity on defense. I want to transfer that to how I play offense.”
Shinsky was a first-team All-Greater Allegheny Conference pick on offense last season and a second-teamer on defense. He recorded 45 tackles and six sacks.
Penn State, Pitt, Temple and Virginia also have expressed interest. He attended camps at Temple, Pitt and Kent State, getting an offer from Kent State that day.
Pitt, Shinsky said, is interested in him as a defensive end.
The UTEP offer stems from the hire of former Steelers offensive line coach Sean Kugler, who, to no surprise, is recruiting the WPIAL.
King, himself, was a lineman and sees potential in Shinsky.
“I made the mistake of trying to work out with him and his linemen friends,” King said. “Connor is always the one who encourages me. He is a great kid who is always looking out for the people he cares about.”
The recruiting process has its advantages. But keeping it all in perspective and prioritized is key.
“It's a one-step-at-a-time, one-coach-at-a-time process,” Shinsky said. “I am just trying to keep it all organized. It can get wild.”
Perhaps more than impressing college coaches who have yet to see him make a tackle or a impede a defender, Shinsky wants to make his mark in the program while upholding the example set by former standout players.
“I owe it all to the seniors that left; I want to keep their tradition going,” Shinsky said. “I have seen how hard they have worked and the time they've put in.”
As for visits, Shinsky looked at St. Francis during a passing scrimmage, went to Virginia's junior day and attended a spring practice at Penn State.
He's also planning an unofficial visit to Youngstown State.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.