ShareThis Page

New coach hopes to lead Greensburg Salem in GAC

| Thursday, Aug. 22, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
Greensburg Salem quarterback Adam Indhof passes against Mt. Pleasant during a 7 on 7 passing tournament at Mt. Pleasant High School on July 12, 2013, in Mt. Pleasant.
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
Greensburg Salem defensive back Simeon Stevens intercepts a pass against Laurel Highlands during a 7 on 7 passing tournament at Mt. Pleasant High School on July 12, 2013, in Mt. Pleasant.

The return to the Greater Allegheny Conference in 2012 didn't go as planned for Greensburg Salem.

Injuries to key starters, inexperience and lack of depth led to a 2-7 record. After the season, Casey Cavanaugh decided to resign as coach to spend more time with his family.

Greensburg Salem didn't look far for a new coach. The district hired assistant Dave Keefer, who had been on Cavanaugh's staff since 2006.

Keefer's goal is getting the team in position to compete in the conference. And with numerous starters returning, Keefer said he feels that goal is within reach.

“When we played in the Keystone Conference in 2011, we had a pretty good team and things came easy,” Keefer said. “We had a couple good players returning, but we didn't have the supporting cast.

“We weren't mentally prepared for the adversity we met. It was a year of growing pains. We have to learn and grow. The job is to get more consistency and build a program like Franklin Regional.”

Quarterback is one of the most important positions for any team. Dan Waters started as a freshman but transferred. So Keefer is looking to seniors Adam Indof and Nate Sweeney as well as junior Brady Mason to secure the spot. Sweeney also can play wide receiver.

Keefer said he likes Indof's leadership.

“I'd rather have a competitor who can lead the team than someone who cannot,” Keefer said. “It should be a healthy battle.”

Dom McKinley, who shared time with Tyler Shook in 2012, is expected to handle the load in the running game.

Keefer has fine-tuned the offense, going to a two-back set with spread tendencies.

Simeon Stevens and newcomer Marvin Barclay are among the top receivers along with tight end Kenny Clark.

The strength of the team could be the offensive and defensive lines. Senior center Don Chedrick is back after missing the 2012 season with a knee injury. Also returning are senior guard Grant Mularski, junior tackle Ryan Caldwell and junior guards Bob Stafford and Grant Slezak.

“We have nine players who can play on the offensive and defensive lines,” Keefer said. “Up front, we are really sound.”

The defense should be solid, especially if the offense is successful. Keefer said too many times the defense didn't get much rest last year.

The defensive line and Clark at middle linebacker will be key in the 4-2-5 stack. The secondary also returns three starters in Sweeney, McKinley and Stevens.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.