Share This Page

Eliminating mental mistakes key for Mohawk

| Thursday, Aug. 22, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

Heading into its season finale against New Brighton last season, Mohawk still had a chance to make the playoffs despite its 2-6 record.

The Warriors lost, 35-28, but entering 2013, it's a two-fold reminder that they can play meaningful football late in the season and improve to avoid that type of disappointment.

“That game literally came down to the last play,” coach Joe Lamenza said.

“I think there's a lot to be learned from that game. So we're trying to build on that.”

Lamenza said a big focus of the offseason has been eliminating “mental breakdowns,” mistakes on both sides of the ball.

The coach said many contributors from that game will return this season after the Warriors shed just a handful of graduates, so he hopes those lessons stick with the large group of returning players.

He pointed to running back Shane McFarland and linemen Travis Giardina and Chris Culley as players who have tried to lead the team's growth in the offseason to ensure the mistakes that were made last season aren't repeated in 2013.

“They've helped hold their teammates accountable for what needs to be done this offseason,” Lamenza said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.