OLSH looks to bounce back from injury-riddled campaign
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Last season was a tough one for head coach Bill Daniels and his team.
Our Lady of the Sacred Heart finished the campaign — one that saw the list of injured players get longer each week — with a 1-8 record. The Chargers' lone victory of came in the second game, a 42-26 triumph over Western Beaver.
“Unfortunately, last year was difficult,” Daniels said. “Injuries decimated us. Two years ago, we went 5-4 and stayed pretty healthy throughout — maybe a sprained ankle or two.
“Last year was just the opposite. We had kids with concussions, broken bones — season-ending injuries.”
In the past, the Chargers' offensive success relied heavily on running back Isiah Neely. But this being the first of the post-Neely era for OLSH, Daniels is hopeful he'll have a number of players ready to step into leadership roles.
First on that list of leaders is two-way standout Tony Marra, a senior who will start at fullback and linebacker.
The offense will be led by senior quarterback Billy Mulcahey, who tallied 151 yards and a touchdown last season. Mulcahey's primary target will be senior wideout Nick Metz.
Daniels is hopeful his offensive line will be a strength.
“We ran a real quality offseason program,” Daniels said. “We got bigger and stronger.”
The Chargers will also benefit from having a year of Big Seven Conference experience under their belts.
“We're looking for a much better year this year,” Daniels said of his fourth-year program. “We're still learning how to play football, how to practice, how to go through two-a-days.
“We're getting better each year.”
No matter how the 2013 campaign plays out from a wins-and-losses standpoint, Daniels will continue to reinforce value of hard work.
“We don't have any superstars,” Daniels said. “We have to play hard and play together to be successful.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.