Union aiming to build on postseason appearance
Union players and coaches are optimistic about returning to the WPIAL playoffs for the second straight year.
The Scotties are building their hopes around three players who are drawing interest from Division I schools.
Ben Young, a 5-foot-10, 169-pound senior, can play nearly every skill position and was Union's leading receiver last year with 13 catches for 322 yards.
Seniors Curtis Caughey (6-3, 270) and Jamie Hooks (6-2, 250) are the largest linemen Stacy Robinson has coached in 17 years at Union.
“With about 25 players, we don't have much depth,” Robinson said. “We're in a tough conference.
“We have to stay healthy.”
The Scotties are relying on returning letterwinners to replace 10 players who graduated.
Senior Clarence Parchman and junior Anthony Rush are fighting to be starting quarterback to replace Drew Robinson, who threw for more than 1,200 yards and 15 touchdowns in 2012.
Senior Rob Clark is expected to start at running back.
Cody Smith, a 5-8, 200-pound senior, will join Caughey and Hooks on the offensive and defensive lines.
“Cody is the more typical size lineman we've had,” Robinson said.
Caughey isn't surprised he and Hooks tower over teammates.
“Growing up, we were always the two big kids,” Caughey said.
Senior Dakota Cameron (6-2, 210) will move to tight end after starting at tackle at year ago.
Senior linebacker Malik Williams is a key defensive returnee.
After beating Beth-Center, 21-7, in the first round, Union lost to Sto-Rox, 33-8, in the quarterfinals of the WPIAL Class A playoffs last year.
Players agreed improvement is a top priority.
“We want to go beyond the second round,” Parchman said.
Caughey said the Scotties were satisfied to have reached the playoffs a year ago after a long absence.
Now, they want to do it again.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.