Share This Page

Rough finish in 2012 to serve as building block for Mapletown

| Thursday, Aug. 22, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

After a promising 3-3 start a year ago, things got bad for Mapletown down the stretch.

The Maples dropped their final three games and were outscored, 133-22. The tough ending, however, should prove to be a building block for coach George Messich's squad.

Several returning players gained varsity experience. In particular, the Maples should have a vastly improved and large offensive line.

Messich returns six players up front, including two senior guards and two players who saw significant action as a freshman and sophomore.

Mapletown will be led by junior quarterback Ben Boone, who sat out last season to concentrate on basketball.

“He's a real quick kid,” he said.

“He has a good arm and has come a long way in a short period of time. He has a lot of intangibles you want in a quarterback, and he's a very smart student on the field and in the classroom.”

Boone, who will lead the spread attack, has a deep crop of running backs, highlighted by senior Colby Kincell and junior Adam Hein.

“Every team who plays the game, your goals have to be to have a winning season and squeak into the playoffs,” Messich said. “We should continue to improve.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.