ShareThis Page

Bethel Park's productive 2nd quarter leads to 38-0 win over Plum

| Friday, Aug. 30, 2013, 11:12 p.m.

Bethel Park and Plum played to a scoreless tie through one quarter of their season-opening Quad Central game Friday night at Bethel Park Stadium.

But the Black Hawks tallied 24 points in the second quarter to take a 24-0 lead at the break. In the end, sixth-ranked Bethel Park upended the Mustangs, 38-0.

First-year Plum coach Matt Morgan said he saw the good and not so good of a first game under the lights.

“There were some positives tonight,” he said.

“We beat ourselves, though. We gave away 24 points on turnovers. You can't give the ball up to a good team in the red zone and expect to win.”

The Plum defense forced a pair of Bethel Park three-and-outs to start the game. However, the Black Hawks broke through on their third drive as they moved 86 yards on 13 plays.

Bethel Park sophomore quarterback Levi Metheny capped the drive with a 10-yard run early in the second quarter. The point-after kick made it 7-0. A bad snap on a punt on Plum's possession after the Black Hawks' score put Bethel Park in business at the Mustangs' 1.

On the first play, tailback Zach Enick plunged into the end zone for the score. The extra point put the Black Hawks ahead, 14-0.

Bethel Park's defense rose up and forced a fumble on Plum's next possession, but the Mustangs returned the favor and held the Black Hawks on downs at Plum's 26. However, the Mustangs were not able to move the ball offensively and had to punt.

Bethel Park then put together an 11-play, 82-yard drive that ended with a Metheny 1-yard scoring run with 16 seconds to go in the first half.

The Black Hawks recovered a fumble on the ensuing kickoff and turned it into three points. Danny Christenson booted a 27-yard field goal.

“I thought we were slow out of the box on offense,” Bethel Park coach Jeff Metheny said. “Plum's defense did a really nice job against us. Our defense played well, and that is something we we've been concerned with.”

Quarterback Will Fuhrer completed 3 of 7 passes for 32 yards in the first half and finished 7 of 16 for 72 yards. He was sacked four times, and Plum turned the ball over five times. Metheny carried 10 times for 59 yards and scored on runs of 10, 1 and 1 yards. He completed 8 of 16 passes for 73 yards.

“We could've wrapped up and tackled a little better, but I think we played pretty good defense,” Morgan said. “Offensively, it comes down to pure execution. We just weren't executing.”

Michael Love is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.