Union's Young dominates Leechburg in victory
Friday night turned into the Benjamin Young show as the Union senior wide receiver led the Scotties to a 33-13 nonconference win over visiting Leechburg.
Young had 79 rushing yards on 11 carries and scored three times.
Young scored two of his three touchdowns in the first half as the Scotties (1-1) jumped ahead, 12-0. He scored on runs of four and five yards.
“It was important to get that first win tonight,” Union coach Stacy Robinson said.
“It feels good to get that first win.”
In addition to his three rushing scores, Young also added five catches for 34 yards. Scottie junior quarterback Anthony Rush was 7 for 11 for 110 yards and one touchdown.
“Benjamin Young can do a little bit of it all,” Robinson said. “He's athletic, and he's as good as they come.”
Leechburg (0-2) couldn't get going on offense in the first half as the Blue Devils went three and out on their opening possession and then turned it over on downs on their second possession.
“Credit to Union's players and coaches,” Leechburg coach Mark George said. “They played very hard. I just don't think we played as hard as we can play.”
The Scotties took what looked like an insurmountable 20-0 lead when Union's Jordan Best sliced through the defense for a 27-yard score with 7:13 left in the third quarter.
Young made it 27-0 less than a minute into the fourth quarter with his third score of the evening.
Jeff DeBaldo is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.