Share This Page

Rematch for Monessen, Brentwood is special

| Thursday, Sept. 5, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Sidney Davis/Trib Total Media
Brentwood's Justin Vickless, left, rolled for 197 yards and a touchdown against Monessen a year ago.
Valley News Dispatch
Brentwood's Justin Vickless breaks through the Springdale defense during the second half Friday, Nov. 2, 2012, at Fox Chapel. Bill Shirley | For the Valley News Dispatch

When Monessen traveled to Brentwood for a Black Hills Conference meeting last season, it was more than just two good football teams going head to head.

The game culminated months of much-publicized bad blood, accusations and then a healing process in light of a suspected racial incident between the two schools at a basketball game.

Playing in front of Steelers quarterback Charlie Batch and television crews from news stations throughout the Pittsburgh region, the Greyhounds and Spartans managed to play one of the most entertaining games of the season that Monessen held on to win, 35-28.

“Through all of the pomp and circumstance and distractions, we managed to play a pretty good football game,” Monessen coach Andy Pacak said. “I think it may have been a game that helped set the stage for our entire season.”

The Greyhounds went on to win every game but one in the rugged conference en route to a 9-2 season.

Tomorrow's rematch at Monessen won't have the pre-game hype. There won't be a bevy of news stations there filming pre-game festivities.

That doesn't make the game any less important as both teams are ranked in Trib Total Media's Top 10 in Class A.

“In this conference, with these teams, this is a game that means so much,” said Pacak. “If you have designs on winning the conference, on being successful, this is one you want to win.

“And, looking on tape, this Brentwood team is no different a Brentwood team than I have come to know the last 30 years. They are pretty good, pretty solid.”

The Spartans (1-0, 1-0) feature one of the premier running backs in Class A in Justin Vickless, a four-year starter who lit up Monessen's defense for 197 yards on 24 carries, including a touchdown a year ago.

Pacak, who knows a little about talented running backs after coaching many at Monessen (1-0, 1-0), paid Vickless the ultimate compliment.

“He's the kind of kid I would like to have playing football for me,” he said. “He is a pleasure to watch, on both sides of the ball. He really gets after it. Stopping him, I think, is not going to be a pleasure.”

However, there was some concern earlier that a knee injury might keep Vickless out of the game. Last week against Serra, he tweaked the knee, left the contest and did not return.

“He looked pretty darn good to me on the tape,” Pacak said. “I'm sure he will be going full tilt Friday night.”

Pacak said the Spartans have more than a solid running game as quarterback Connor McWilliams hit on five of seven passes for 116 yards last week.

“They have a combination of kids who can catch and throw the ball,” he said.

“I would say that our best defense will be using our ground game to control the game and keep the ball away from their offense.”

Of course, the Greyhounds aren't without weapons on offense.

Last week, in a 40-0 rout of California, the Greyhounds rushed for 431 yards with Clintell Gillaspie (180) and Javon Brown (130) combining for 310 yards. The duo also exploded for four long-range touchdowns, the shortest being a 47-yard jaunt by Gillaspie.

In last year's game, Gillaspie was a major receiving threat, catching three passes for 172 yards and two scores.

In that game, Monessen didn't seal the win until a goal line stand in the closing minutes halted Brentwood's potential game-winning score.

Pacak is hoping this year's game is not so stressful.

“With my stress level, I could do without that,” he said with a smile.

Jeff Oliver is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2666 or joliver@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.