Share This Page

Freeport erases 10-point deficit, downs Deer Lakes

| Saturday, Sept. 14, 2013,

Freeport rallied to score two second-half touchdowns and came from behind to defeat Deer Lakes, 14-10, on Friday in a Class AA Allegheny Conference game at Lancer Stadium.

Freeport (1-2, 1-2) scored two second-half touchdowns in a 1:59 span.

“Every week, we ask them to grow up,” Freeport coach John Gaillot said. “I am very proud of this team to come back the way they did.”

Freeport finished with 329 yards of offense, all of it rushing. Quarterback Andrew Romanchak led the Yellowjackets with 112 yards, including a 76-yard touchdown run. Steve Lassinger added 110 yards, including a 17-yard touchdown run, and Michael Troup had 86 yards. Romanchak went 0 for 6 passing.

Freeport's first score, on Lassinger's run, came after Matt McCausland's 22-yard field goal gave Deer Lakes (0-3, 0-3) a 10-point lead. After a defensive stop, Romanchak scored to give Freeport the lead.

“Romanchak seems to really want to step up for this team,” Gaillot added. “And Steven Lassinger is the gutsiest, most hard-nosed kid. It was amazing how hard he ran.”

Deer Lakes senior quarterback Josh Plocki rushed for 113 yards and completed 6 of 15 passes for 74 yards. Deer Lakes had 209 yards of total offense.

“I am not faulting my kids at all because I am proud of the effort they gave,” Deer Lakes coach T.J. Wiley said.

Thomas Zuck is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.