Penn-Trafford still looking to improve after Week 2 win
By Doug Gulasy
Published: Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013, 9:24 a.m.
With a goal of winning the Quad East this season, the Penn-Trafford football team wanted to begin section play with a victory last week.
The Warriors accomplished that, but coach John Ruane is still hoping for more from his team in the coming weeks.
Penn-Trafford (1-1, 1-0 Quad East) bounced back from a season-opening loss by defeating Norwin, 17-3, last Friday at Warrior Stadium.
Still, Ruane said many of the problems that plagued his team in a 21-14 loss to North Hills a week earlier continued on Friday night.
“We have to get better in certain areas still,” Ruane said. “It's early in the season, so we're going to continue to work at improving on certain things. I felt like we played with a lot of energy in the fourth quarter compared to a week ago. I thought we ran to the football a lot better as well.”
The areas Ruane is still focusing on include tackling and finishing drives.
Through two games, Penn-Trafford has scored 31 points. The Warriors turned the ball over three times against Norwin, with a couple of those miscues costing them chances to score.
“The more points we score, the more players we get involved in the game,” Ruane said. “We've kind of been limited as far as the number of guys we've been getting into the game because we're not even doing special teams with turnovers and things like that. It's strictly offense and defense. So there's a lot of angles for how you can look at it, but basically we have to get better.”
The rushing offense is leading the way for Penn-Trafford through two games. Junior Devin Austin rushed for 185 yards against Norwin, while Tom Stinelli added 86 yards and a touchdown.
At this point, however, Ruane is looking for more balance offensively. While quarterback Brett Laffoon and receiver Timmy Vecchio connected on an 85-yard touchdown pass against Norwin, the Warriors have mostly stuck to a run-first approach through the first two games. Ruane said he would look to change that in the coming weeks — possibly as early as this week's game at Altoona.
“Teams are going to start stacking the box, and we're going to have to do something about that,” Ruane said.
Defensively, the Warriors forced Norwin to commit four turnovers. Senior Ryan Marasti's second-quarter interception snuffed out a Norwin scoring opportunity, while junior Zack Queen came up with two big interceptions in the fourth quarter — including one that led to Penn-Trafford's final touchdown.
“That last one seemed to be the dagger for them because we drove the ball right down the field and scored the final touchdown,” Ruane said.
Still, Ruane said tackling issues remain for the Warriors. That concerns him with Friday's game at Altoona.
While the Mountain Lions failed to score last week in a 20-0 loss to Kiski, Mountain Lions quarterback Eli Mencer rushed for 115 yards the week before in a 21-0 victory over Norwin.
“It's going to be a battle,” Ruane said. “They're a good football team — in particular their defense. They take pride in what they do on D. They have some talent on offense. They have a humungous running back who's a bruiser. So we have to (improve) tackling, but we've got to be in position first and foremost. They're a good football team, (and) they're well-coached.”
While the Mountain Lions' team will present a challenge, so will the two-hour trip to Altoona. Ruane said the team would leave extra early on Friday in order to stick as closely as possible to its routine.
“The trip itself is a whole different ballgame,” he said. “It just gets you out of your routine. Altoona is used to it because they do it every road game. We're not, so that's something we're going to have to get acclimated to early on.”
Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-388-5830, via email at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @dgulasy_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.