Share This Page

No. 6 Mars, Schultheis rush past Indiana

| Friday, Sept. 13, 2013, 10:39 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Indiana's Jacob Zilinskas pulls in a first-quarter interception over Mars' Jason Lozzi on Friday, Sept. 12, 2013, at Mars High School.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Mars running back Orion Rinaman breaks off a second-quarter run to set up a touchdown against Indiana on Friday, Sept. 12, 2013, at Mars High School.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Mars running back Joshua Schultheis runs over Indiana's Ian Scott on Friday, Sept. 12, 2013, at Mars High School.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Mars running back Joshua Schultheis scores a second-quarter touchdown against Indiana on Friday, Sept. 12, 2013, at Mars High School.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Mars' Owen Nearhoof break up a second-quarter pass intended for Indiana's Darrious Carter on Friday, Sept. 12, 2013, at Mars High School.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Indiana running back DeQuan West cuts back on Mars' Nolanon Skirtich on Friday, Sept. 12, 2013, at Mars High School.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Indiana running back Ian Scott beats Mars' Travison Ganter to the end zone for a first-quarter touchdown on Friday, Sept. 12, 2013, at Mars High School.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Mars running back Joshua Schultheis runs through a first-quarter tackle attempt by Indiana's Jacob Zilinskas on Friday, Sept. 12, 2013, at Mars High School.

Mars coach Scott Heinauer insists the Planets have more of a passing game than they've had in the past because of quarterback Owen Nearhoof.

With the way Mars ran the football against No. 10 Indiana on Friday, anyone watching the Planets' 38-15 win will have to take Heinauer's word for it.

Led by Josh Schultheis, who gained 212 yards and scored three touchdowns, No. 6 Mars used a powerful ground attack to pile up 356 rushing yards during a Class AAA Greater Allegheny win at Mars Athletic Complex.

The Planets attempted only three passes, completing one.

“The line pulled it together,” Schultheis said. “When they do what they're supposed to do, things open up.”

Credit left tackle Gabe Spurlock, left guard Trevor Heyl, center Robb Miller, right guard John King, right tackle Joel Glomb and tight end Nolan Skirtich.

“Our big thing was to be physical,” Heinauer said. “And we were physical. I thought being physical would be the difference in the game, and it happened to be the difference in the game.”

The win by Mars (2-1, 2-1) coupled with No. 4 Franklin Regional's loss to Highlands means the Planets have a chance to force a three-way tie atop the conference with a win at Highlands next week.

Besides Schultheis, Jason Lozzi ran for 58 yards and a 17-yard touchdown, the second of three scoring runs for Mars in the third quarter.

Indiana quarterback Sean Thompson completed 8 of 15 passes for 103 yards but was intercepted twice — both by Mars' Travis Ganter. Ian Scott ran for a team-high 76 yards for Indiana (1-2, 1-2).

Mars scored on its first possession, going to Schultheis five consecutive times to open the game, highlighted by a 44-yard gain. Schultheis scored from 2 yards out for a 7-0 lead.

“Schultheis is a great back,” Indiana coach Mark Zilinskas said. “He's done it week in and week out.”

Scott intercepted Nearhoof and, on the next play, ran 36 yards to tie the score 7-7 midway through the first quarter. But Schultheis scored his second touchdown, a 1-yard run, for a 14-7 Mars second-quarter lead.

Mars came out in the second half intent on being even more physical. And running the ball. Both worked.

Schultheis' third TD, a 2-yarder, put Mars ahead 21-7.

“We'll throw it if we have to, but we felt like we needed to kill clock and move the football down the field,” Heinauer said. “We did that in the second half.”

Jason Mackey is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at jmackey@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Mackey_Trib.

Related Content
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.