Big Macs prove too much for Plum
Friday's homecoming game surely didn't play out as the fans of Plum hoped.
The game ended in a 17-7 loss to Quad Central opponent Canon-McMillan and was marred by a fight in the fourth quarter. Senior Canon-McMillan linebacker Alec Rideout was ejected along with Plum senior offensive tackle Dante Palmieri.
“From my viewpoint, (Rideout) swung on (Palmieri), and (Palmieri) swung back and retaliated, and that turned into what the big scuffle was,” Plum coach Matt Morgan said.
“I had to run out onto the field because no one was stopping it. The refs weren't stopping it.”
The fight occurred after Mustangs running back Nathan Turchick scored on a 1-yard plunge. Rideout and Palmieri will be suspended for one game.
Hopes of a comeback followed for Plum (0-5, 0-5). The Mustangs got the ball back at their 36, and quarterback Will Fuhrer moved the ball through the air all the way to the Canon-McMillan 14, before a false start penalty and a sack pushed Plum out of field-goal range.
A dropped touchdown pass on fourth down sealed the first win of the year for Canon-McMillan (1-4, 1-3).
“We practiced hard this week,” Canon-McMillan coach Ron Coder said. “The kids worked hard, and I'm glad we got this win for them.
“It builds confidence for them going into next week. I'm disappointed how we played down in that melee down there, but overall I was pleased with our performance.”
Gary Horvath is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.