Share This Page

Leechburg beats Northgate to snaps 13-game losing streak

| Saturday, Oct. 5, 2013, 12:24 a.m.

Leechburg entered the season with eight straight losses to end the 2012 season and continued that trend by dropping the first five games this year.

However, game No. 6 in 2013 turned out to be different as Leechburg defeated Northgate, 35-14, on Friday night for its first regular-season win since Aug. 31, 2012.

The win snapped a 13-game losing streak for the Blue Devils.

“It feels great,” Leechburg head coach Mark George said. “These kids feel really good and we executed on both sides of the ball.”

The Blue Devils (1-5, 1-4) jumped out to a 21-6 first-quarter lead on two rushing touchdowns from Alexander Kalmar, who scored from 2 yards out and then had a highlight-reel 25-yard score.

Northgate (1-5, 1-4) responded after Leechburg's first score with a touchdown of their own thanks to Johnny Camello's 6-yard run with 3:56 left in the first quarter.

Sophomore Rodney Burrows got the Flames back in the game with a 95-yard kickoff return with 3:54 left to go before halftime. Northgate converted the two-point conversion to make it 28-14.

“That return was big,” Northgate head coach Brandon LeDonne said. “We were struggling a little bit on both sides of the ball and it was big to get us back in the game.”

Leechburg was able to keep Northgate at bay before Kristopher Smith's 1-yard touchdown erased any hopes of a Flames comeback.

“As coaches we kept calm and said, ‘This game is yours, right here right now,' ” said George. “We talked to them calmly and said ‘If you do the little things right the big things take care of themselves.' ”

Kalmar led the Leechburg rushing attack with a game-high 93 yards on 15 carries and two scores. Teammate Alex Sipolino completed 7 of 11 passes for 85 yards and one touchdown.

Jeff DeBaldo is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.