ShareThis Page

The Leader examines West Shamokin's playoff chances

| Thursday, Oct. 10, 2013, 1:36 a.m.

This could be the week for West Shamokin.

It seems like much more than just a year ago that The Leader was trying to predict — and missed (!) — the week that the Wolves would snap the WPIAL's longest losing streak. The Wolves have been a .500 team from the time of that first win over Riverview last year, and its 4-2 record this season has it ready for some more firsts.

West Shamokin reached four wins in a season for the first time Saturday against Wilkinsburg, and it hosts winless South Side Beaver in a game that would clinch the first winning regular season for the Wolves' program.

But crunching the numbers, it's the games in Springdale and Leechburg that could hand the Wolves their first-ever WPIAL playoff berth.

A likely Springdale loss to one-loss Avonworth would mean the Dynamos — a head-to-head loser against the Wolves — can get no more than four conference wins. The berth would then be official with a Leechburg loss to Riverview, but at that point it would be almost academic — the Blue Devils need to win out against Riverview, the Wolves and undefeated North Catholic to get to four wins.

That's enough of scenarios and possibilities, though. The Leader will just tell you how it's going to happen this week.

South Side Beaver at West Shamokin

The Rams are winless, but three of their last four losses were by single digits. West Shamokin is the better team, but the gap is closer than the records indicate. West Shamokin, 27-16

Riverview at Leechburg

The Blue Devils proved The Leader wrong and snapped their losing streak last week. So why not a winning streak to set up a Leechburg-West Shamokin game with playoff implications for both teams next week? Leechburg, 28-20

Northgate at Apollo-Ridge

Apollo-Ridge has been really good this year, but they've been overshadowed by some of the other stories going on in Armstrong County. Don't sleep on the Vikings going forward, and this game should be a signal of what's to come. Apollo-Ridge, 42-7

Ford City at Burrell

It's hard to get a read on this game because both teams have had some good moments and more bad moments this year. The Leader will think back to his math classes and resort to the transitive property of football — Ford City beat Freeport, Freeport beat Burrell, therefore... Ford City, 17-14

Deer Lakes at Kittanning

The Kittanning offensive line will be playing the role of a Mack truck, and there's Deer Lakes in the headlights. Spoiler alert: It doesn't end well for the deer. Kittanning, 48-7

East Allegheny at Freeport

Like Ford City/Burrell, this game is essentially an elimination game. The Yellowjackets got a great win last week, but East Allegheny has a big edge in the passing and kicking games with seniors Kyle Whipple and Vinny Barone. East Allegheny, 31-20

Redbank Valley at Clarion

Clarion has played like a juggernaut by winning all six of its games by 35 points or more. The Bulldogs' offense will get some things going, but this is a jump upward in class for Redbank Valley. Clarion, 42-17

Karns City at Punxsutawney

It's Punxsutawney's nickname, but the Gremlins are the much better team at chucking the football. Punxsy has maxed out at 34 points this year, and they'll probably need more to win. Karns City, 49-28

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.