A-K Valley teams don't want repeat of 2012 playoff performance
By Bill Beckner Jr.
Published: Sunday, Oct. 27, 2013, 10:33 p.m.
The 2012 high school football postseason in the A-K Valley ended with an abrupt thud. Seven local teams advanced to the WPIAL playoffs, but none won a game.
The rare occurrence came with some history: It had been 19 years since no local teams advanced to the second round. To boot, local football season ended by Nov. 2 — the earliest that had happened around these parts in a century.
Apollo-Ridge coach John Skiba doesn't see the area's qualifiers paying another visit to Wipeout City.
“There are some good teams,” Skiba said. “As far as we're concerned, we know we need to get this thing going, and this is the group to do it. We have that explosive ability.”
The WPIAL will announce playoff pairings Monday night at the DoubleTree Hotel in Green Tree, and Apollo-Ridge will be one of five local teams that will get seeded in the brackets.
The Vikings (7-2) secured third place in the Eastern Conference with a convincing win Friday over West Shamokin. They'll be traveling in the first round, but their seeding isn't a major concern to Skiba.
“It's anybody's guessing game right now,” he said. “Our conference has shown how good it is. We've played against some of the best in Class A.”
Highlands (6-3) stumbled in its regular-season finale by falling at Knoch, 19-7. Rather than share the Class AAA Greater Allegheny Conference title, Highlands was left pondering what-ifs.
Back-to-back losses could ding the Golden Rams' image, but they'll still open the playoffs at home.
Highlands' starters haven't scored an offensive touchdown in two games. Last week, five turnovers helped Knoch play spoiler.
“When it's happening like that, it's tough to rebound. We just didn't make a play when we needed a play,” Highlands coach Sam Albert said. “We had the conference championship sitting there waiting for us. Our kids worked hard this week. We rested them thinking that would help us, and it didn't turn out the way we thought it would.”
Valley (6-3) had a bumpy late-season stretch but made it back to the Class AA playoffs for the second consecutive time. The Vikings also will play away from home Friday.
“Last year, I don't think anybody expected us to get in the playoffs, let alone win six games,” Valley coach Chad Walsh said. “Now, we kind of expected to be in the playoffs this year. So our mentality was a little bit different.”
Kittanning (9-0) figures to draw the best local seed after its first unbeaten regular season since 1976. The Wildcats, who didn't make the playoffs last season, won the Class AA Allegheny Conference outright with a 28-27 thriller over Shady Side Academy on Friday. It will be at home in the first round.
“None of us know what it feels like to be in the playoffs,” Wildcats junior receiver Nick Bowers said. “I think we are ready to make this big step.”
Kiski Area (5-4) secured its first five-win season since 2007 by beating Latrobe, but the Cavaliers likely will face a stern test as a fifth-place finisher in Quad A.
“Most of the kids in the locker room were in the playoffs last year,” Kiski Area coach Dave Heavner said. “They understand playoff atmosphere and what it takes to win in a Quad-A football game. We certainly have some experience there, so we're going to lean on that.”
The possibility exists that Kiski Area could draw Central Catholic (9-0) and quarterback J.J. Cosentino, the Kiski Area transfer who committed to Florida State.
Apollo-Ridge (2007) and Kittanning (1975) each have one playoff win in school history.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.