Norwin closes out season with nonconference game at Shaler
Connellsville quarterback Jade Maher loses a fumble as Norwin linebacker Corey Chrisman looks to recover during their Sept. 27, 2013, game in Connellsville.
Photo by Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review
The Norwin football team will get one final chance to pick up its second win of the season when the Knights travel to play Shaler in a nonconference game Friday night.
The Knights (1-7, 1-7) closed out their conference schedule last week with a 31-7 loss at Hempfield (6-2, 5-2). Sophomore Peyton Deri rushed for 41 yards on nine carries, including a 23-yard touchdown run in the third quarter, and senior Kyle Baum added eight receptions for 81 yards. It wasn't enough, however, as Hempfield's Joey DeFloria rushed for 182 yards and three touchdowns.
Turnovers and penalties hurt Norwin against Hempfield. The Knights turned the ball over four times, including once inside their own 5-yard line, and committed 12 penalties — seven before the snap.
“I take 120 percent blame for this,” Norwin coach Art Tragesser said after the game. “We came out with no focus, no energy. My fault. It's just totally my fault.”
Shaler — who Norwin beat, 20-13, last season — is having some struggles of its own. The Titans (0-8) enter Friday's game on a 21-game losing streak dating back to the 2011 season.
Quarterback Josh Crawford leads Shaler, having passed for 578 yards and three touchdowns on the season. Tim Nickel has rushed for 355 yards and two touchdowns.
Shaler's defense is struggling, allowing an average of 46.6 points per game.
Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830, via email at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @dgulasy_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.