Share This Page

Seneca Valley races past Fox Chapel, 36-7

| Saturday, Oct. 26, 2013, 12:30 a.m.
Bill Shirley | For The Valley News Dispatch
Latrobe's Logan Carns (left) attempts to elude Kiski Area defenders on Friday, Oct. 25, 2013, at Davis Field in Vandergrift.

Junior T.J. Holl had a hand in all five Seneca Valley touchdowns to help lead the No. 5 Raiders to a 36-7 Quad North victory over Fox Chapel on Friday night at NexTier Stadium.

Holl threw a touchdown pass, scored on an interception return and rushed for three scores to lead the Raiders (8-1, 6-1). He also had a late interception that thwarted a Fox Chapel drive.

“I really got a present there on that interception,” Holl said.

“Tyler (Hudanick) was taking him down, so props to Tyler for that one. It just fell into my lap, and all I had to beat was linemen to the end zone. At the half, we knew we were pretty sloppy at times, so we tried to clean that up for the second half, and I think we did. We have to for the playoffs.”

Seneca Valley finished the regular season a game behind Central Catholic in the Quad North. Fox Chapel finished the season 2-7, 2-5 in the conference.

Fox Chapel moved the ball but couldn't overcome turnovers and penalties. Billy Urso completed 17 of 43 passes for 179 yards and one score. But interceptions were his downfall.

Holl completed 9 of 16 passes for 142 yards, the touchdown and one interception.

Keith Frankert had six receptions for 110 yards and a score to lead Fox Chapel. Brandon Mitchell added five catches for 57 yards. Nigel Garnett led the Foxes with 109 yards rushing on 14 attempts. Eric Mrkonja had four catches for 100 yards and a score. Holl added 123 yards rushing on 14 carries for Seneca Valley.

On the fourth play of the game, Seneca Valley opened the scoring when Holl scrambled and found Mrkonja, who had gotten behind coverage, for a 70-yard touchdown pass.

But that didn't open the floodgates.

Fox Chapel tried to keep it tight and had the ball more than the Raigers in the first half, but penalties and turnovers hurt them. Seneca Valley went into the half with a 22-point lead. Two first-half interceptions, one returned for a score, helped Seneca Valley build its lead.

The first came just before the end of the first quarter when Holl picked an errant pass from Urso out of the air as Hudanick was taking down Urso. Holl returned the interception 17 yards for the touchdown.

The next interception came late in the second quarter. Michael Denny intercepted Urso at the Fox Chapel 27 and returned it to the 7-yard line. After a Fox Chapel penalty moved the ball to the 3-yard line, Holl scored on the next play for the 22-0 lead.

Seneca Valley scored twice in the third quarter, both Holl runs, before Fox Chapel scored on a 10-yard pass from Urso to Frankert with 4:04 left in the game.

Thomas Zuck is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.